While the Acharya has done stotras on Vishnu and Shiva giving a head-to-foot description of the deities, he has shown great originality in the fund of his innovative descriptions and analogies.
Then why did he not do it here in the case of ambaal? Why did he have to borrow from the Lalita Sahasranama? It shows only the Acharya’s humility and the high pedestal on which he places the Lalita-sahasranama.
Post a Comment