Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Soundarya Lahari - Part 331

(Continued...)


Read along with the word ‘para-brahmamahishhi’ (shloka #97), we should have meant only the para-Brahman by the word ‘tvat-patiH’ in #26. 

But in the case of para-brahman, there is no question of any action like ‘playing or sporting’ (‘viharati’); that is why the interpretation of ‘Kameshvara-Shiva’ (who is non-distinct from ambaa) for ‘tvat-patiH’ in shloka #26.

(Continued...)

No comments:

Post a Comment